<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inserting random letters into acronyms to make pronounceable words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ev4.org/wordpress/2007/06/13/inserting-random-letters-into-acronyms-to-make-pronounceable-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ev4.org/wordpress/2007/06/13/inserting-random-letters-into-acronyms-to-make-pronounceable-words/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Eble</title>
		<link>http://www.ev4.org/wordpress/2007/06/13/inserting-random-letters-into-acronyms-to-make-pronounceable-words/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Eble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ev4.org/wordpress/2007/06/13/inserting-random-letters-into-acronyms-to-make-pronounceable-words/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Actually, acronyms are typically defined as being pronounceable initialisms, so SQL is only an acronym if you pronounce it like &quot;sequel&quot;.  You&#039;re also wrong in saying that those of us who do pronounce it as a word are adding letters to it.  I write it &quot;SQL&quot;, and I pronounce it &quot;sequel&quot;, I&#039;m not adding letters to it, I&#039;m interpreting the letters given in the initialism.  Which brings me to my last point: has there ever, in the history of ever, been a case where someone pronounced SQL instead of saying the letters that someone else misinterpreted them? No.  That would be, to use one of your categories, idiotic.

And what really gripes me is people complaining about phantom letter sounds being added to speech when they add actual letters to their writing.  &quot;Vowel&quot; has one l.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, acronyms are typically defined as being pronounceable initialisms, so SQL is only an acronym if you pronounce it like &#8220;sequel&#8221;.  You&#8217;re also wrong in saying that those of us who do pronounce it as a word are adding letters to it.  I write it &#8220;SQL&#8221;, and I pronounce it &#8220;sequel&#8221;, I&#8217;m not adding letters to it, I&#8217;m interpreting the letters given in the initialism.  Which brings me to my last point: has there ever, in the history of ever, been a case where someone pronounced SQL instead of saying the letters that someone else misinterpreted them? No.  That would be, to use one of your categories, idiotic.</p>
<p>And what really gripes me is people complaining about phantom letter sounds being added to speech when they add actual letters to their writing.  &#8220;Vowel&#8221; has one l.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

